29 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
29 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
|
description: Run representation tests (Bechdel and related) on a manuscript or scene
|
||
|
|
argument-hint: "[path, glob, or selection]"
|
||
|
|
allowed-tools: [Read, Glob, Grep]
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Analyze the text at `$ARGUMENTS` against the representation tests below. For each test, give a clear **PASS / FAIL / N/A** with specific evidence (quoted dialogue or character action with location).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Gender representation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. **Bechdel Test** — At least two named women who talk to each other about something other than a man.
|
||
|
|
2. **Reverse Bechdel** — At least two named men who talk to each other about something other than a woman.
|
||
|
|
3. **Mako Mori Test** — At least one female character has her own narrative arc not in service of a man's story.
|
||
|
|
4. **Sexy Lamp Test** — Could any female character be replaced with a sexy lamp without affecting the plot? If yes, name them and explain.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Character-prominence tests (assess if applicable characters exist)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
5. **Sphinx Test** — How do women interact with other characters and what is their prominence in the action?
|
||
|
|
6. **DuVernay Test** — Do minority characters have fully realized lives beyond their relationship to the plot or to majority characters?
|
||
|
|
7. **Shukla Test** — Do two ethnic-minority characters talk to each other about something other than race/ethnicity?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Output format
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- One line per test: `**Test Name** — PASS/FAIL/N/A — brief explanation with quoted evidence`
|
||
|
|
- **Overall assessment** — strengths and weaknesses in representation
|
||
|
|
- **Patterns** — recurring issues or strengths worth flagging
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Only assess what is present in the text. Don't infer character backgrounds the text doesn't establish.
|