49 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
49 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
|
name: council
|
||
|
|
description: Convene a council of expert perspectives on a hard question. Selects 2-5 agents that best match the topic, runs them in parallel, then synthesizes their perspectives into a structured briefing.
|
||
|
|
user-invocable: true
|
||
|
|
arguments:
|
||
|
|
- name: question
|
||
|
|
description: The question or problem to present to the council
|
||
|
|
required: true
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
You have been asked to convene a Council of Experts to address the following question:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
$ARGUMENTS
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Instructions
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. **Review the question carefully.** Understand the domain, the specific problem, and what kind of expertise would help.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
2. **Select 2-5 expert agents** from the council-of-experts plugin's agents/ directory. Choose agents whose described expertise best matches the question's domain. Read the agent descriptions to understand their specializations. You do not need to use all agents — pick only those whose perspective would be genuinely useful. Prefer agents from the council-of-experts plugin when available. You may also use other available agents if they are a better fit for the specific question.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
3. **Launch all selected agents in parallel** using the Agent tool. Each agent should receive:
|
||
|
|
- The original question exactly as stated
|
||
|
|
- Context about what the user is working on (if apparent from conversation history)
|
||
|
|
- An instruction to provide their expert perspective, concrete suggestions, and specific next steps
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
4. **After all agents return**, synthesize their responses into a structured briefing:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Council Members Consulted
|
||
|
|
List each agent consulted and why they were selected.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Key Perspectives
|
||
|
|
Summarize each agent's unique contribution — what did they see that the others might not?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Points of Agreement
|
||
|
|
Where do multiple experts converge on the same conclusion or recommendation?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Points of Disagreement
|
||
|
|
Where do experts disagree, and what drives the disagreement?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Suggested Next Steps
|
||
|
|
A prioritized, actionable list combining the best recommendations from all experts. Note which expert suggested each step.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Important
|
||
|
|
- The Skeptic agent is almost always useful — include it unless the question is purely factual with no interpretation.
|
||
|
|
- Do NOT summarize agents' responses verbatim. Synthesize and cross-reference.
|
||
|
|
- If agents surface the same insight independently, that's a strong signal — highlight it.
|
||
|
|
- If an agent raises a concern no one else did, that's also worth highlighting.
|
||
|
|
- Keep the briefing concise and actionable. The user wants clarity, not volume.
|