---
description: Synthesize prior phase reviews into a final manuscript assessment
argument-hint: "[path to manuscript and/or prior review notes]"
allowed-tools: [Read, Glob, Grep]
---

Using whatever prior-phase review notes the user provides (or that exist in the working directory under names like `review-*.md`, `notes/review/`, etc.), produce a final, integrated assessment of the manuscript at `$ARGUMENTS`.

## Story architecture

1. **Inciting incident** — clear, compelling, well-placed?
2. **Plot points** — major turning points obvious and impactful?
3. **Climax** — does it feel earned and satisfying?
4. **Resolution** — does it resolve the key conflicts appropriately?

## Integration analysis

5. **Scene flow** — do scenes connect logically and maintain momentum?
6. **Pacing rhythm** — variation between fast and slow?
7. **Character arc completion** — do characters grow consistently?
8. **Setting consistency** — locations and time periods coherent?
9. **Theme reinforcement** — do plot, character, and setting support the central themes?

## Structural recommendations

- Scenes to add, remove, or combine
- Pacing adjustments
- Character development gaps
- Setting opportunities
- Overall readability improvements

## Final assessment

- The manuscript's greatest strengths
- Top 3–5 areas needing improvement
- Concrete action steps for revision
- Overall readiness assessment for the writer's intended market

Present the synthesis directly in the conversation. Quote specifically from prior reviews and from the manuscript to support each point — name the chapter/scene and the issue. The goal is a revision roadmap the writer can act on.