Files
movq 6e4edc09d1 refactor(fiction-assistance)!: reduce to portable guidance and analysis (v2.0.0)
Strip the Universalis-specific vault layout and card-management
machinery. The plugin is now a general-purpose fiction toolkit:
nine commands that take a manuscript path/glob/selection via
\$ARGUMENTS and write their output to the conversation.

Surviving commands, flattened into commands/:
- analyze-story: structural and statistical analysis
- bechdel-test: representation tests (Bechdel + related)
- check-continuity: plot/character/world continuity
- check-voice: per-character voice consistency
- developmental-review: structural feedback on a scene/chapter
- extract-research: world-building and research inventory
- final-review: synthesis of prior-phase reviews
- generate-timeline: chronology with consistency checks
- strategic-review: craft-based critique with priority ranking

Removed (vault and card management): 10 update-*-cards commands,
cleanup-generated, update-changed, update-links,
update-chapter-summaries, validate-story, validate-pdf, score-scenes.
The original bespoke command set is preserved in 65c29d7 for recovery.

Agent (line-editor) and skill (reviewing-fiction) were already
portable and are unchanged. plugin.json no longer needs the
commands subdirectory paths since the layout is flat. Marketplace
description updated to reflect the general-purpose scope.

BREAKING CHANGE: All update-*-cards, cleanup-generated, update-changed,
update-links, update-chapter-summaries, validate-story, validate-pdf,
and score-scenes commands are removed. perform-bechdel-tests is renamed
to bechdel-test. review-final is renamed to final-review.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-16 18:28:53 -05:00

1.6 KiB

description, argument-hint, allowed-tools
description argument-hint allowed-tools
Run representation tests (Bechdel and related) on a manuscript or scene [path, glob, or selection]
Read
Glob
Grep

Analyze the text at $ARGUMENTS against the representation tests below. For each test, give a clear PASS / FAIL / N/A with specific evidence (quoted dialogue or character action with location).

Gender representation

  1. Bechdel Test — At least two named women who talk to each other about something other than a man.
  2. Reverse Bechdel — At least two named men who talk to each other about something other than a woman.
  3. Mako Mori Test — At least one female character has her own narrative arc not in service of a man's story.
  4. Sexy Lamp Test — Could any female character be replaced with a sexy lamp without affecting the plot? If yes, name them and explain.

Character-prominence tests (assess if applicable characters exist)

  1. Sphinx Test — How do women interact with other characters and what is their prominence in the action?
  2. DuVernay Test — Do minority characters have fully realized lives beyond their relationship to the plot or to majority characters?
  3. Shukla Test — Do two ethnic-minority characters talk to each other about something other than race/ethnicity?

Output format

  • One line per test: **Test Name** — PASS/FAIL/N/A — brief explanation with quoted evidence
  • Overall assessment — strengths and weaknesses in representation
  • Patterns — recurring issues or strengths worth flagging

Only assess what is present in the text. Don't infer character backgrounds the text doesn't establish.