6e4edc09d1
Strip the Universalis-specific vault layout and card-management
machinery. The plugin is now a general-purpose fiction toolkit:
nine commands that take a manuscript path/glob/selection via
\$ARGUMENTS and write their output to the conversation.
Surviving commands, flattened into commands/:
- analyze-story: structural and statistical analysis
- bechdel-test: representation tests (Bechdel + related)
- check-continuity: plot/character/world continuity
- check-voice: per-character voice consistency
- developmental-review: structural feedback on a scene/chapter
- extract-research: world-building and research inventory
- final-review: synthesis of prior-phase reviews
- generate-timeline: chronology with consistency checks
- strategic-review: craft-based critique with priority ranking
Removed (vault and card management): 10 update-*-cards commands,
cleanup-generated, update-changed, update-links,
update-chapter-summaries, validate-story, validate-pdf, score-scenes.
The original bespoke command set is preserved in 65c29d7 for recovery.
Agent (line-editor) and skill (reviewing-fiction) were already
portable and are unchanged. plugin.json no longer needs the
commands subdirectory paths since the layout is flat. Marketplace
description updated to reflect the general-purpose scope.
BREAKING CHANGE: All update-*-cards, cleanup-generated, update-changed,
update-links, update-chapter-summaries, validate-story, validate-pdf,
and score-scenes commands are removed. perform-bechdel-tests is renamed
to bechdel-test. review-final is renamed to final-review.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.7 KiB
1.7 KiB
description, argument-hint, allowed-tools
| description | argument-hint | allowed-tools | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actionable, craft-based literary criticism focused on fixable problems | [path, scene, or selection] |
|
Re-read $ARGUMENTS with these specific craft lenses:
- Narrative Economy — which scenes/passages serve multiple story functions vs. single purposes? Where could content be combined or streamlined without losing essential atmosphere or emotional grounding?
- Reader Engagement — where might reader attention flag? What creates the strongest engagement vs. the weakest? Consider both pacing AND reader investment/immersion.
- Character Revelation — where do we learn about characters through action/dialogue vs. exposition? Which methods are most effective?
- Tension Management — how does tension build and release throughout? Where could it be better managed?
- Reader Experience Balance — identify passages that could be enhanced for both efficiency AND enjoyment. Avoid suggesting cuts that sacrifice atmosphere, emotional grounding, or reader orientation for mere speed.
Provide actionable, specific feedback with scene and line references where possible. Focus on problems with clear solutions rather than subjective preferences.
Structure your response
- Brief analysis for each of the 5 craft lenses
- Specific scene and line references for suggested improvements
- Priority ranking of suggested changes (highest impact first)
- Concrete revision suggestions where appropriate
Avoid subjective style preferences. Focus on craft elements that demonstrably affect reader experience and story function. The goal is prose that's both engaging AND purposeful, not just fast. Consider whether suggested changes enhance or diminish reader investment and emotional immersion.