65c29d795b
Snapshot of the fiction-assistance plugin in its original Universalis- specific form before generalization. Adds the missing plugin.json manifest (subdirectory command paths explicitly listed), moves the two stray root-level review files into their proper homes (review-all.md into the reviewing-fiction skill, review-final.md as a command with frontmatter), and registers the plugin in the marketplace. Preserved here so the original card-generation and vault-maintenance commands remain recoverable when the plugin is reduced to a portable guidance-and-analysis subset in the next commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
39 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
39 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
Analyze and score all scenes in the manuscript on several quality dimensions (0.5-10 scale), updating the ratings.csv file.
|
|
|
|
## Task Instructions
|
|
|
|
1. **Compile chapters**: Run `python scripts/compile_manuscript.py --chapters-only` to ensure current content
|
|
|
|
2. **For each compiled chapter** from `Compiled/Chapters/` directory, read it and perform the following steps.
|
|
|
|
3. **Extract scenes**: Identify individual scenes (marked by `## Scene Name` headers) from each chapter
|
|
|
|
4. **Score each scene** on these specific qualities (0.0-10.0 scale):
|
|
- **Plot Advancement**: How significantly the scene moves story forward
|
|
- **Pacing**: Flow, rhythm, tension building/release
|
|
- **Opening Hook**: How effectively the scene draws readers in immediately
|
|
- **Closing Hook**: How well it creates anticipation or transitions
|
|
- **Narrative**: Prose quality, imagery, emotional resonance
|
|
- **Dialogue**: Character voice consistency, naturalness, purpose
|
|
- **Emotion**: How effectively the scene triggers emotions
|
|
|
|
5. **Scoring criteria**:
|
|
- Use your literary analysis expertise
|
|
- Consider scene function within chapter/story context
|
|
- Rate relative to professional fiction standards
|
|
- 0.0-3.0: Major issues, needs substantial work
|
|
- 4.0-6.0: Functional but needs improvement
|
|
- 7.0-8.5: Good quality, minor polish needed
|
|
- 9.0-10.0: Exceptional, publication-ready
|
|
|
|
6. **Update ratings.csv**: Create/update with new scores in format:
|
|
```
|
|
Scene,Plot Advancement,Pacing,Opening Hook,Closing Hook,Narrative,Dialogue,Emotion
|
|
Chapter X: Scene Name,8.5,7.0,9.0,8.0,8.5,7.5,8.0
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
7. **Provide summary**: Total scenes analyzed, highest/lowest rated scenes, key patterns observed
|
|
|
|
Focus on objective story craft assessment. Skip any placeholder scenes (marked "Scene content goes here" or similar).
|
|
|
|
The user is seeking to publish this manuscript and requires an accurate assessment. |