65c29d795b
Snapshot of the fiction-assistance plugin in its original Universalis- specific form before generalization. Adds the missing plugin.json manifest (subdirectory command paths explicitly listed), moves the two stray root-level review files into their proper homes (review-all.md into the reviewing-fiction skill, review-final.md as a command with frontmatter), and registers the plugin in the marketplace. Preserved here so the original card-generation and vault-maintenance commands remain recoverable when the plugin is reduced to a portable guidance-and-analysis subset in the next commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
40 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
40 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
# Strategic Review Command
|
|
|
|
**Description:** Provides actionable, craft-based literary criticism focused on fixable problems rather than subjective preferences.
|
|
|
|
**Usage:** `/strategic-review [content to review]`
|
|
|
|
**Agent:** line-editor (show the user the output of the agent)
|
|
|
|
**Prompt:**
|
|
```
|
|
Re-read "$ARGUMENTS" with these specific craft lenses:
|
|
|
|
1. **Narrative Economy**: Which scenes/passages serve multiple story functions vs single purposes? Where could content be combined or streamlined without losing essential atmosphere or emotional grounding?
|
|
|
|
2. **Reader Engagement**: Where might reader attention flag? What creates the strongest engagement vs weakest? Consider both pacing AND reader investment/immersion.
|
|
|
|
3. **Character Revelation**: Where do we learn about characters through action/dialogue vs exposition? Which methods are most effective?
|
|
|
|
4. **Tension Management**: How does tension build and release throughout? Where could it be better managed?
|
|
|
|
5. **Reader Experience Balance**: Identify passages that could be enhanced for both efficiency AND enjoyment. Avoid suggesting cuts that sacrifice atmosphere, emotional grounding, or reader orientation for mere speed.
|
|
|
|
Provide actionable, specific feedback with scene and line references where possible. Focus on problems that have clear solutions rather than subjective preferences.
|
|
|
|
**Structure your response as:**
|
|
- Brief analysis for each of the 5 craft lenses
|
|
- Specific scene and line number references for suggested improvements
|
|
- Priority ranking of suggested changes (highest impact first)
|
|
- Concrete revision suggestions where appropriate
|
|
|
|
Avoid subjective style preferences. Focus on craft elements that demonstrably affect reader experience and story function. Remember: the goal is prose that's both engaging AND purposeful, not just fast. Consider whether suggested changes enhance or diminish reader investment and emotional immersion.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Example Output:**
|
|
- Multi-function scenes identified vs single-purpose areas
|
|
- Specific scene and line ranges that could be tightened
|
|
- Tension peaks/valleys with suggested improvements
|
|
- Character revelation effectiveness analysis
|
|
- Prioritized action items for revision
|