6e4edc09d1
Strip the Universalis-specific vault layout and card-management
machinery. The plugin is now a general-purpose fiction toolkit:
nine commands that take a manuscript path/glob/selection via
\$ARGUMENTS and write their output to the conversation.
Surviving commands, flattened into commands/:
- analyze-story: structural and statistical analysis
- bechdel-test: representation tests (Bechdel + related)
- check-continuity: plot/character/world continuity
- check-voice: per-character voice consistency
- developmental-review: structural feedback on a scene/chapter
- extract-research: world-building and research inventory
- final-review: synthesis of prior-phase reviews
- generate-timeline: chronology with consistency checks
- strategic-review: craft-based critique with priority ranking
Removed (vault and card management): 10 update-*-cards commands,
cleanup-generated, update-changed, update-links,
update-chapter-summaries, validate-story, validate-pdf, score-scenes.
The original bespoke command set is preserved in 65c29d7 for recovery.
Agent (line-editor) and skill (reviewing-fiction) were already
portable and are unchanged. plugin.json no longer needs the
commands subdirectory paths since the layout is flat. Marketplace
description updated to reflect the general-purpose scope.
BREAKING CHANGE: All update-*-cards, cleanup-generated, update-changed,
update-links, update-chapter-summaries, validate-story, validate-pdf,
and score-scenes commands are removed. perform-bechdel-tests is renamed
to bechdel-test. review-final is renamed to final-review.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
42 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
42 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
description: Analyze character voice — consistency, distinctiveness, and development
|
|
argument-hint: "[path, glob, or selection]"
|
|
allowed-tools: [Read, Glob, Grep]
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Read the manuscript at `$ARGUMENTS` and analyze how distinct and consistent each character's voice is. Report findings to the conversation.
|
|
|
|
## What to analyze
|
|
|
|
For each named character with meaningful dialogue:
|
|
|
|
### Speech profile
|
|
- **Vocabulary** — formal/informal, technical/plain, characteristic word choices
|
|
- **Sentence shape** — short/long, complete/fragmented, complex/simple
|
|
- **Rhythm** — clipped, flowing, interrupted, deliberate
|
|
- **Emotional register** — how they show anger, fear, affection, humor
|
|
- **Background markers** — regional, generational, professional, cultural cues that appear in speech
|
|
|
|
### Consistency
|
|
- Does the voice hold across scenes and chapters?
|
|
- Does it adapt appropriately under stress, with different conversational partners, or across an arc — or does it slip and re-form without reason?
|
|
- Does any growth in the character show up *in the voice* rather than only in the narration?
|
|
|
|
### Distinctiveness
|
|
- Could a reader identify the speaker with the dialogue tags removed? Test by sampling unattributed lines.
|
|
- Are any two characters bleeding into each other? Name the overlap.
|
|
- Are any characters' voices so close to the narrator's that they don't stand out?
|
|
|
|
## Output format
|
|
|
|
Per character (focus on the major ones):
|
|
|
|
- **Voice profile** — 2-3 sentences capturing the signature
|
|
- **Sample lines** — 2-3 quoted lines that exemplify the voice
|
|
- **Consistency** — strong / mostly stable / drifts; cite the strongest example and any slip
|
|
- **Distinctiveness** — distinctive / shared traits with [other character] / undifferentiated
|
|
|
|
Close with:
|
|
- **Overall assessment** — which voices are working, which need work
|
|
- **Priority fixes** — three to five concrete suggestions ordered by impact
|